Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 8 results ...

Flyen, C, Hauge , Å L, Almås, A-J and Godbolt , Å L (2018) Municipal collaborative planning boosting climate resilience in the built environment. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 9(01), 58-69.

Gatti, M P (2018) Maintenance, reconstruction and prevention for the regeneration of historic towns and centers. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 9(01), 96-111.

Godbolt, Å L, Flyen, C, Hauge, Å L, Flyen, A-C and Moen, L L (2018) Future resilience of cultural heritage buildings: how do residents make sense of public authorities’ sustainability measures?. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 9(01), 18-30.

Lassandro, P and Cosola, T (2018) Climate change mitigation: resilience indicators for roof solutions. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 9(01), 4-17.

Marques, M, Monteiro, R and Delgado, R (2018) An improved model for seismic risk assessment in Portugal. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 9(01), 70-83.

Ortiz, R, Macias-Bernal, J M and Ortiz, P (2018) Vulnerability and buildings service life applied to preventive conservation in cultural heritage. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 9(01), 31-47.

Rahouti, A, Datoussaïd, S and Descamps, T (2018) Safety assessment of a high-rise dormitory in case of fire. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 9(01), 84-95.

Yaman Galantini, Z D and Tezer, A (2018) Resilient urban planning process in question: Istanbul case. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 9(01), 48-57.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: resilience; Istanbul; vulnerabilities; urban resilience; five steps approach; resilient urban planning process; urban planning paradigms
  • ISBN/ISSN:
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-10-2016-0038
  • Abstract:
    Purpose This paper aims to describe an updated urban planning process to expose a theoretical model bridging the resilience concept and urban planning, and then it explains this process through Istanbul case. Design/methodology/approach A hypothetical framework is proposed based on the three different but complementary aspects of resilience which are identified as “resilience to what”, “resilience where” and “resilience how”, as well as “five elements process” referring the upgraded components of urban planning processes. Additionally, the methodology conducted to figure out a resilient urban planning process is listed as an expert opinion survey, a two-stage policy Delphi survey, public opinion survey and multi-criteria analysis. Findings It is possible to apply this process in many different case studies for various scales and temporalities for coping with the key vulnerabilities and promote the administrative response capacity. Research limitations/implications Considering size of the study area and the unclarified roles of urban authorities, it is difficult to have a consensus on the key vulnerabilities and the prior urban policies. Originality/value The proposed process is beneficial in addressing the most prominent vulnerabilities and developing capacity to manage unexpected changes, through the collaborative decisions of a wide range of urban planning authorities. Depending on the severity of the disturbances, applying this process to identify changing priorities can be a crucial policy, both for long- or short-term urban policy-making, for further studies.